/* "populations should get smaller to avoid the inevitable crash. "
Oh? And exactly how does one achieve this end? Who decides what part of the population is no longer needed? Are you in a insane belief that anyone would want to decrease their population? */
That is the matter of the social contract. Yes, the society as a whole has an interest to check the population growth. China has done it. The rest of the growing world has to do it as well, sooner or later.
"Obviously Humanity has partly overruled natural regulation, something no other spicies to date has achieved. And you call our spiecies stupid? Arrogant is a far better description if there's to be any laid out."
Human species is stupid when compared to the wolves or lions or tigers.
"And being a humanitarian doesn't negate being for preservation of other animal spiecies."
It does, if one prefers one african or syrian over one chimp.
Africans are directly competing with the chimps for the lebensraum.
"However argueing that certain humans shouldn't be allowed to continue their existence however argueing for ones own continued existence rules out being a humanitarian."
I have not argued about individuals. I have argued on the level of populations. Rights are relative to populations.
0
@Zervo
/* "populations should get smaller to avoid the inevitable crash. "
Oh? And exactly how does one achieve this end? Who decides what part of the population is no longer needed? Are you in a insane belief that anyone would want to decrease their population? */
That is the matter of the social contract. Yes, the society as a whole has an interest to check the population growth. China has done it. The rest of the growing world has to do it as well, sooner or later.
"Obviously Humanity has partly overruled natural regulation, something no other spicies to date has achieved. And you call our spiecies stupid? Arrogant is a far better description if there's to be any laid out."
Human species is stupid when compared to the wolves or lions or tigers.
"And being a humanitarian doesn't negate being for preservation of other animal spiecies."
It does, if one prefers one african or syrian over one chimp.
Africans are directly competing with the chimps for the lebensraum.
"However argueing that certain humans shouldn't be allowed to continue their existence however argueing for ones own continued existence rules out being a humanitarian."
I have not argued about individuals. I have argued on the level of populations. Rights are relative to populations.