"Tell me the difference? Exactly how are you going to decrease "level of populations" by not affecting individuals."
With the one-child policy.
The difference is between the Tragedy of the Commons and a working Social Contract.
The difference is between that of Nash equilibrium, Pareto and Hicks.
Unchecked individualism will doom the population, it is game theory 101.
And the problem is that "human rights" neglect the population part, even the parts that has been written into the international conventions on war and especially genocide. There is no genocide at the level of individuals, there is genocide only at the level of populations. The so-called "humanitarians" are willing to carry out genocides on populations under the flag of "saving" millions of individuals. It is a classic Tragedy of the Commons.
0
@Zervo
"Tell me the difference? Exactly how are you going to decrease "level of populations" by not affecting individuals."
With the one-child policy.
The difference is between the Tragedy of the Commons and a working Social Contract.
The difference is between that of Nash equilibrium, Pareto and Hicks.
Unchecked individualism will doom the population, it is game theory 101.
And the problem is that "human rights" neglect the population part, even the parts that has been written into the international conventions on war and especially genocide. There is no genocide at the level of individuals, there is genocide only at the level of populations. The so-called "humanitarians" are willing to carry out genocides on populations under the flag of "saving" millions of individuals. It is a classic Tragedy of the Commons.