'@TheChief'
First sentence? Yeah basically.
Second sentence? No.
Do you not understand what a constitution is? It's a document that a state is built on, and certain things that are allowed to be done, wiggle room, and certain things that are not allowed. For instance your first sentence is based out of that stuff. We have that right and it can't be taken away, so says the constitution. The same exact amendment that makes your first sentence true, also makes your second one false. Because congress cannot make any laws respecting an establishment of religion.
Which obviously means we cannot become a theocracy.
At this point I think you don't know what a theocracy is.
Enough people supporting something actually is irrelevant if it would break with the constitutions fundamentals, some things in there can't be abolished.
0
'@TheChief'
First sentence? Yeah basically.
Second sentence? No.
Do you not understand what a constitution is? It's a document that a state is built on, and certain things that are allowed to be done, wiggle room, and certain things that are not allowed. For instance your first sentence is based out of that stuff. We have that right and it can't be taken away, so says the constitution. The same exact amendment that makes your first sentence true, also makes your second one false. Because congress cannot make any laws respecting an establishment of religion.
Which obviously means we cannot become a theocracy.
At this point I think you don't know what a theocracy is.
Enough people supporting something actually is irrelevant if it would break with the constitutions fundamentals, some things in there can't be abolished.