@Jacob 1) I am not one of you, therefore you and those associate with you are "your kind", not "my kind" or "our kind". Simply a matter of grammar.
You are interpreting it in one way. Certainly not what it's drafters intended, but a legitimate interpretation. Other would argue it, and in many situations their interpretations would be equally legitimate.
2) You've shown utter disgust and contempt for it. That view subscribe to one interpretation of the Constitution. I find it too broadly encompassing for safety's sake. I stand by my statement it's a matter best left to state legislative bodies.
Never said democracy is evil. I said it is flawed and unrestricted it is a doomed endeavor.
The Constitution doesn't mention the redefinition of social institutions as one of the powers allotted the federal government and therefore is within the authority of the state governments.
20
@Jacob 1) I am not one of you, therefore you and those associate with you are "your kind", not "my kind" or "our kind". Simply a matter of grammar.
You are interpreting it in one way. Certainly not what it's drafters intended, but a legitimate interpretation. Other would argue it, and in many situations their interpretations would be equally legitimate.
2) You've shown utter disgust and contempt for it. That view subscribe to one interpretation of the Constitution. I find it too broadly encompassing for safety's sake. I stand by my statement it's a matter best left to state legislative bodies.
Never said democracy is evil. I said it is flawed and unrestricted it is a doomed endeavor.
The Constitution doesn't mention the redefinition of social institutions as one of the powers allotted the federal government and therefore is within the authority of the state governments.