@TheChief
" I side with the officer because he was not proven guilty. " He never went to trial. Why? Because the "prosecutor" aka the DA had his back.
"The very fact that he is a police officer should count for something and the fact that the man he killed was a criminal should serve even more."
No. This is not, nor was it ever how evidence works.
"The violence WASN'T police incited." I'll take the testimony of those who were there over your attempts at psychoanalysis any day. Sorry.
"libtards" You're done. Go back to kindergarten kid. It seems your education up to now has been useless.
756
@TheChief
" I side with the officer because he was not proven guilty. " He never went to trial. Why? Because the "prosecutor" aka the DA had his back.
"The very fact that he is a police officer should count for something and the fact that the man he killed was a criminal should serve even more."
No. This is not, nor was it ever how evidence works.
"The violence WASN'T police incited." I'll take the testimony of those who were there over your attempts at psychoanalysis any day. Sorry.
"libtards" You're done. Go back to kindergarten kid. It seems your education up to now has been useless.