Your entire spiel on "globalists in charge of all our governments" are just your view of the world from your far-right perspective. But there would be no reason for anyone in Europe to blame an "external threat" like you claim - the threat from the far-right is very real just as it is without the Russian element.
It's more strange to the rest of us that you all that claim yourselves to be such nationalists all are so desperate for Putins approval. The entire far-right is basically blowing Putin in public and then act surprised when the rest of us notices.
Why this love for the Russian president? If your all so desperate for a strong leader, why can't you just idolize your own leaders (even more then you do) instead of fawning over Putin all the time?
Russia is clearly not "the only Christian great power that is left in the world" - the US is clearly more of a Christian nation than Russia is, for instance. Putin uses the orthodox church like anything else to strengthen his own power but he started out as a KGB-officer. Neither he or the men around him are religious in any way at all.
Which is actually a good thing about both him and Trump - at least they're not delusional in that way, unlike Trump's VP Pence.
It's been said so many times but truth clearly doesn't matter to you I see.
Still - Sweden is not the rape capitol of anything - that's a completely bogus claim made by two infamous islamophobes.
It's been debunked repeatedly, like here:
And of course it's complete bullshit to claim that "Islam brings terror". People adhering to f***ed-up ideologies commits acts of terror in accordance with their ideology.
Some people who are Muslim claims Islam gives them a license to commit terror - some people who are Christians, Jewish, Hindu or Sikh also do. In the west it's more common to cite political ideologies as an excuse to commit terror acts though - mostly fascism at the moment - but you far-righters don't actually admit you're fascist these days of course.
But the majority of either Muslims or Christians or any other religion of course never either commit or support any acts of terror and the religions in and of themselves gives no blanket support for terror.
It's you personal interpretation of the religion that makes all the difference.
But being a far-right fundamentalist you of course agree with Muslim fundamentalists that Islam gives it's followers a license to commit acts of terror.
But since your two fundamentalist camps only comprise a few percent of the entire world population you don't get to decide that and most Muslims and Christians of course don't agree with either of you at all.
So why don't you fundamentalist just do the rest of us the favor of pissing of and fighting out your war between yourselves?
I promise you - no one will miss either of you if you all die in that epic battle between your faiths you both dream about.
If all you far-right fundamentalist die valiantly in the defense of Christianity or "Western culture" or what ever f***ed-up nonsense you think you fight for I promise I'll build you a nice memorial praising you deeds - OK?
And the US intelligence community hasn't actually said that "Russia hacked the American election". What the joint US intelligence agencies have said is that Russia sought to influence the election in the support of Trump.
One of the ways they did that was to hack certain institutions like the DNC.
But I think your choosing you wording here based on the propaganda you've been reading, because I know the "Russia didn't hack the election!" has been used by the far-right by claiming that there is no proof that Russia actually hacked into electronic voting machines to change the actual vote count. That's completely true - there is no such evidence.
But it's also a complete red herring as the intelligence community HAS NEVER CLAIMED Russia influenced the election specifically that way or that that is the ONLY way in which they could have influenced the election.
Spreading hacked emails and fake news is also a way to influence the election and that's what's been claimed by US intelligence.
Exactly how much of an influence they actually had have not been specified as that's very hard to say. But the fact that they did try to influence the election is serious enough and yes, there is evidence of that:
0
@rphb
Jesus, you're like a poster boy for every right-wing fantasy aren't you? *facepalm*
Trump's win wasn't the largest since Reagan - it was actually one of the smallest in all of US history:
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/16/politics/donald-trump-electoral-victory-claim/
There are plenty of both reasons for and evidence that Assad used chemical weapons - just like he's done on several occasions before:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/26/syria-assad-forces-carried-out-sarin-attack-says-french-intelligence
Your entire spiel on "globalists in charge of all our governments" are just your view of the world from your far-right perspective. But there would be no reason for anyone in Europe to blame an "external threat" like you claim - the threat from the far-right is very real just as it is without the Russian element.
It's more strange to the rest of us that you all that claim yourselves to be such nationalists all are so desperate for Putins approval. The entire far-right is basically blowing Putin in public and then act surprised when the rest of us notices.
Why this love for the Russian president? If your all so desperate for a strong leader, why can't you just idolize your own leaders (even more then you do) instead of fawning over Putin all the time?
Russia is clearly not "the only Christian great power that is left in the world" - the US is clearly more of a Christian nation than Russia is, for instance. Putin uses the orthodox church like anything else to strengthen his own power but he started out as a KGB-officer. Neither he or the men around him are religious in any way at all.
Which is actually a good thing about both him and Trump - at least they're not delusional in that way, unlike Trump's VP Pence.
It's been said so many times but truth clearly doesn't matter to you I see.
Still - Sweden is not the rape capitol of anything - that's a completely bogus claim made by two infamous islamophobes.
It's been debunked repeatedly, like here:
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-19592372
And of course it's complete bullshit to claim that "Islam brings terror". People adhering to f***ed-up ideologies commits acts of terror in accordance with their ideology.
Some people who are Muslim claims Islam gives them a license to commit terror - some people who are Christians, Jewish, Hindu or Sikh also do. In the west it's more common to cite political ideologies as an excuse to commit terror acts though - mostly fascism at the moment - but you far-righters don't actually admit you're fascist these days of course.
But the majority of either Muslims or Christians or any other religion of course never either commit or support any acts of terror and the religions in and of themselves gives no blanket support for terror.
It's you personal interpretation of the religion that makes all the difference.
But being a far-right fundamentalist you of course agree with Muslim fundamentalists that Islam gives it's followers a license to commit acts of terror.
But since your two fundamentalist camps only comprise a few percent of the entire world population you don't get to decide that and most Muslims and Christians of course don't agree with either of you at all.
So why don't you fundamentalist just do the rest of us the favor of pissing of and fighting out your war between yourselves?
I promise you - no one will miss either of you if you all die in that epic battle between your faiths you both dream about.
If all you far-right fundamentalist die valiantly in the defense of Christianity or "Western culture" or what ever f***ed-up nonsense you think you fight for I promise I'll build you a nice memorial praising you deeds - OK?
And the US intelligence community hasn't actually said that "Russia hacked the American election". What the joint US intelligence agencies have said is that Russia sought to influence the election in the support of Trump.
One of the ways they did that was to hack certain institutions like the DNC.
But I think your choosing you wording here based on the propaganda you've been reading, because I know the "Russia didn't hack the election!" has been used by the far-right by claiming that there is no proof that Russia actually hacked into electronic voting machines to change the actual vote count. That's completely true - there is no such evidence.
But it's also a complete red herring as the intelligence community HAS NEVER CLAIMED Russia influenced the election specifically that way or that that is the ONLY way in which they could have influenced the election.
Spreading hacked emails and fake news is also a way to influence the election and that's what's been claimed by US intelligence.
Exactly how much of an influence they actually had have not been specified as that's very hard to say. But the fact that they did try to influence the election is serious enough and yes, there is evidence of that:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/washington/2017/01/05/russian-cyberattacks-draw-senate-hearing/96191380/