'@Dasneko'
the leftist keep repeating that to themselves. They say for instance that it was a Russian hack that gave wikileake some inside DNC information, when wikileake themselves says it was an inside leak.
And no offence, but I trust wikileak a little more then the US intelligence community.
And the leak itself, was about making the public aware of some very insidious things that was taking place inside the Democrat party.
So even if the hoax that the Russians were involved had been true, their effect was to make the election MORE democratic, by making the voters aware of information that their own media had been covering up, (that is the dinosaur media such as the Counterfeit News Network or CNN for short)
0
'@Dasneko'
the leftist keep repeating that to themselves. They say for instance that it was a Russian hack that gave wikileake some inside DNC information, when wikileake themselves says it was an inside leak.
And no offence, but I trust wikileak a little more then the US intelligence community.
And the leak itself, was about making the public aware of some very insidious things that was taking place inside the Democrat party.
So even if the hoax that the Russians were involved had been true, their effect was to make the election MORE democratic, by making the voters aware of information that their own media had been covering up, (that is the dinosaur media such as the Counterfeit News Network or CNN for short)