I never refer to the Bible for any of my arguments, moral or otherwise because to do so would be a logical fallacy (appeal to authority), it is simply a lie to claim that I do.
And yes it is a sexual perversion. Just because it takes place in nature don’t mean that it is natural. Because that is not what we (philosophers) mean when we use the word “natural” in a moral context.
We refer to the natural law, that is objective, Absolute morality, that exist independently of human judgments.
The basic all human laws are “malum in se” that is actions that are naturally evil, evil in themselves. Rape, theft and murder are always mentioned as examples of malum in se.
Swindle, robbery, adultery and treason can also logically be added to the list.
Homophilia is an unnatural perversion, because it does not serve the natural purpose of intercourse namely procreation, and procreation within the right context, namely matrimony.
Matrimony is of course something that existed before the church, it is natural. What the church does it to bless it, that is make it official in a legal context, which is important in an organized society. It is one of the key components of an organized society to have legally binding contracts.
But the concept itself is just a man and a women that joins together in order to raise a family.
It is an important aspect of being k-selective.
That is a biological reproduction strategy. There are two basic strategies r-selective that focus on quantity, and k-selective that focus on quality.
To maximize the quality of the offspring’s, we need to maximize the resources that the children get, and matrimony is the result of how humans naturally are. The women is pregnant for a very long time, compared to most species and the baby is very helpless, and require a lot of nurture. So women that lives an optimal life, needs to dedicate of her productive years raising her children, which is why she needs a husband to provide the external resources, for her and their shared children.
It is very sad that feminism have convinced many women to live suboptimal lives, to focus on careers rather than family, which means that they end up wasting their lives on a meaningless career while their uterus dries up and becomes useless.
It is a man’s job to provide for wife and children, he is built to it, he is much stronger both mentally and physically and have far more endurance.
A homophile breaks this whole natural chain, his desires are that of an alcoholic or a compulsive gambler, they are destructive to his own wellbeing. He is left childless, just like the feminist that have been led astray by the false ideology.
Thou may think it too simplistic to simply reduce the purpose of life to the basic biological fact. There may be more to it then this, but this is objectively our purpose, to continue our genes. And we are a k-selective species, we don’t just spit them out by the dozens like a rabbit and hope for the best.
0
'@Nisse'_Hult
I never refer to the Bible for any of my arguments, moral or otherwise because to do so would be a logical fallacy (appeal to authority), it is simply a lie to claim that I do.
And yes it is a sexual perversion. Just because it takes place in nature don’t mean that it is natural. Because that is not what we (philosophers) mean when we use the word “natural” in a moral context.
We refer to the natural law, that is objective, Absolute morality, that exist independently of human judgments.
The basic all human laws are “malum in se” that is actions that are naturally evil, evil in themselves. Rape, theft and murder are always mentioned as examples of malum in se.
Swindle, robbery, adultery and treason can also logically be added to the list.
Homophilia is an unnatural perversion, because it does not serve the natural purpose of intercourse namely procreation, and procreation within the right context, namely matrimony.
Matrimony is of course something that existed before the church, it is natural. What the church does it to bless it, that is make it official in a legal context, which is important in an organized society. It is one of the key components of an organized society to have legally binding contracts.
But the concept itself is just a man and a women that joins together in order to raise a family.
It is an important aspect of being k-selective.
That is a biological reproduction strategy. There are two basic strategies r-selective that focus on quantity, and k-selective that focus on quality.
To maximize the quality of the offspring’s, we need to maximize the resources that the children get, and matrimony is the result of how humans naturally are. The women is pregnant for a very long time, compared to most species and the baby is very helpless, and require a lot of nurture. So women that lives an optimal life, needs to dedicate of her productive years raising her children, which is why she needs a husband to provide the external resources, for her and their shared children.
It is very sad that feminism have convinced many women to live suboptimal lives, to focus on careers rather than family, which means that they end up wasting their lives on a meaningless career while their uterus dries up and becomes useless.
It is a man’s job to provide for wife and children, he is built to it, he is much stronger both mentally and physically and have far more endurance.
A homophile breaks this whole natural chain, his desires are that of an alcoholic or a compulsive gambler, they are destructive to his own wellbeing. He is left childless, just like the feminist that have been led astray by the false ideology.
Thou may think it too simplistic to simply reduce the purpose of life to the basic biological fact. There may be more to it then this, but this is objectively our purpose, to continue our genes. And we are a k-selective species, we don’t just spit them out by the dozens like a rabbit and hope for the best.