'@NeframeTheCosmonaut' the more likely purpose of that law is to die in committee. But even assuming that you're right, what is "anti-discrimination policy" to some is morally unacceptable to others. Being more or less consistent with one's religious beliefs on homosexuality does not make opposition to eminent domain hypocritical.
I wouldn't call a party increasingly influenced by collectivism and ideology of class struggle a lesser evil.
317
'@NeframeTheCosmonaut' the more likely purpose of that law is to die in committee. But even assuming that you're right, what is "anti-discrimination policy" to some is morally unacceptable to others. Being more or less consistent with one's religious beliefs on homosexuality does not make opposition to eminent domain hypocritical.
I wouldn't call a party increasingly influenced by collectivism and ideology of class struggle a lesser evil.