@CorruptUser Of course, it is NATOs fault and not the fault of your corrupt politicians who get kickbacks from Defence industries. If other countries, don't meet their obligated amounts, why should America? NATO does not really benefit the US, it benefits other NATO countries.
Other NATO countries (in Europe) are logistically very easy to attack. Unless Canada, or Mexico are attacking the Continental US, it would be a logistical nightmare. The country in question would need a massive NAVY, meaning the only country who could realistically sustain any attack against the US, Russia (Yes, China's Navy is not large enough).
As you said China could amass a large army cheaply, and they could march through other NATO countries, (once again that is a detriment to them not the US), but how are they going to get to the US? They need a huge NAVY.
0
@CorruptUser Of course, it is NATOs fault and not the fault of your corrupt politicians who get kickbacks from Defence industries. If other countries, don't meet their obligated amounts, why should America? NATO does not really benefit the US, it benefits other NATO countries.
Other NATO countries (in Europe) are logistically very easy to attack. Unless Canada, or Mexico are attacking the Continental US, it would be a logistical nightmare. The country in question would need a massive NAVY, meaning the only country who could realistically sustain any attack against the US, Russia (Yes, China's Navy is not large enough).
As you said China could amass a large army cheaply, and they could march through other NATO countries, (once again that is a detriment to them not the US), but how are they going to get to the US? They need a huge NAVY.
I'm not even going to comment on your racist comments about the Japanese raping people, instead I suggest you read up on the Dunning-Kruger effect (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect).