@CorruptUser "China doesn't need a navy to invade"... "it needs a navy to protect the invasion".... Sooooooo it Needs a Navy for the invasion, just like I said. You are admitting I am right.
"It needs transport and cargo ships"... What do you think most Navy ships comprise of? Why do you think most countries have / have had during war times "Merchant Navies"? Why do you think the 'East India Trading Company' had one of the most powerful militaries during its time? I'll let you in on a little secret, it is because you need a lot of transport and cargo ships in a successful Navy. You are admitting I am right.
"But once a first strike occurs, the US ... will make short work of ... the Chinese *NAVY*"... Why? Because their Navy is not big enough, as I have already stated. Once again, you are admitting I am right.
"you apparently know absolutely nothing about the Pacific theater of WWII"... I have not even mentioned the Pacific Theater of WWII, so how you came to that conclusion is a mystery. Unless you are basing it on me refusing to respond to your racist comments. In particular that it was 'Japanese foreign policy to Rape'. While I am sure many of them did this; I'm also sure many Americans, Australians, Canadians, English, etc. also did. You must remember that history is written by the victors, and even the victors said that it was common, but not that it was their 'foreign policy'.
I see the issue here, I am arguing with a retard, say whatever nonsense comeback you will, I'm done arguing with you, and won't respond.
0
@CorruptUser "China doesn't need a navy to invade"... "it needs a navy to protect the invasion".... Sooooooo it Needs a Navy for the invasion, just like I said. You are admitting I am right.
"It needs transport and cargo ships"... What do you think most Navy ships comprise of? Why do you think most countries have / have had during war times "Merchant Navies"? Why do you think the 'East India Trading Company' had one of the most powerful militaries during its time? I'll let you in on a little secret, it is because you need a lot of transport and cargo ships in a successful Navy. You are admitting I am right.
"But once a first strike occurs, the US ... will make short work of ... the Chinese *NAVY*"... Why? Because their Navy is not big enough, as I have already stated. Once again, you are admitting I am right.
"you apparently know absolutely nothing about the Pacific theater of WWII"... I have not even mentioned the Pacific Theater of WWII, so how you came to that conclusion is a mystery. Unless you are basing it on me refusing to respond to your racist comments. In particular that it was 'Japanese foreign policy to Rape'. While I am sure many of them did this; I'm also sure many Americans, Australians, Canadians, English, etc. also did. You must remember that history is written by the victors, and even the victors said that it was common, but not that it was their 'foreign policy'.
I see the issue here, I am arguing with a retard, say whatever nonsense comeback you will, I'm done arguing with you, and won't respond.