@Lora I haven't seen much hope it would they tried to get it past before SCOTUS got rid of Roe v Wade and with the filibuster of having to need 60 senate votes means they would need all 48 democrats the 2 independent and 10 republican and ever republican in the house voted no on the Women's Health Protection Act, they might have to tweak it a bit if they want any republican support
33
@Lora I haven't seen much hope it would they tried to get it past before SCOTUS got rid of Roe v Wade and with the filibuster of having to need 60 senate votes means they would need all 48 democrats the 2 independent and 10 republican and ever republican in the house voted no on the Women's Health Protection Act, they might have to tweak it a bit if they want any republican support