I am sorry, i might be wrong, but we are talking population density here, are we not? Because if that is the case then Denmark's number is... slightly... larger than Swedens.
Population Density of Denmark is 125 per square km compared to Swedens 20 per square km.
Just to get the other guys in aswell, Norway is 13, Finland is 16.... Iceland is... 3, sorry Iceland, but that is just how it is, tiny fella.
I just can't really see any other way that landmass compared to population can be any other thing? unless that is not how this was supposed to be understood after all?
23
I am sorry, i might be wrong, but we are talking population density here, are we not? Because if that is the case then Denmark's number is... slightly... larger than Swedens.
Population Density of Denmark is 125 per square km compared to Swedens 20 per square km.
Just to get the other guys in aswell, Norway is 13, Finland is 16.... Iceland is... 3, sorry Iceland, but that is just how it is, tiny fella.
I just can't really see any other way that landmass compared to population can be any other thing? unless that is not how this was supposed to be understood after all?
Skål!