Follow Scandinavia and the World:
Facebook   Twitter   Tumblr  


Babysitter





 

Babysitter



Iceland is great with kids. :D

The first Europeans to find America was Icelandic Vikings, and they managed to stay alive for some time before they got killed by the Indians and the winters. They called the land they found Vinland.

The original settlers on Greenland didn’t last long either.

21st October 2010
 


1089 Comments:
 
15 days ago #9226166        

Vinland --> Modern Nova Scotia



Yanai

16 F
16 days ago #9225126        

Damn, that was hillarious :XD:



lmbrake

18 F
26 days ago #9219399        

@DeadlyLittleKate As a Newfie... I have to admit we sound quite different than the rest of you lot.

Bet you're from Ontario, EH?



1 month ago #9213358        

I don't know who is a worse parent; England or Iceland :P (Maybe they should make a baby)



2 months ago #9189454        

Should have said found north america, because the vikings were in Canada, as you mentioned. To be specific Newfoundland area, the name being a tad ironic when I think about it.... Oh btw it's mostly Irish descendants now, and they have the funniest accent, it's like drunken Irish mixed with stereotypical Canadian X) (Just search Newfie accent in youtube) ;)



3 months ago #9175858        

@olvirki

"No I don't think we have any tax records"

That part was a joke.

"As for the Dorset, I have not seen any mention of Dorset findings in the area from that time and the Norse do not mention them. Yes human remains are fragile but Greenland is cold, preserving organic tissue, and we still got inorganic artifacts, tools and the like, which are much more common to find than direct remains."

That is a point.

"In the end the burden of proof is on the other side[.]"

Oh I agree compleatly. I'm that saying that they WERE there, I'm just not sure that there WASN'T anybody there and given the potential political ramifications I tend to tread lightly.

"I am a student that will start to study biology next fall at university."

Good luck! I'm sure you'll be great!



3 months ago #9174514        

@FrankHarr

I am btw not an expert in the field or any field :). I am a student that will start to study biology next fall at university. Assuming I get accepted, but then again, Icelandic universities accept most people. Here the universeties compete over students, not the other way around.



3 months ago #9174509        

@FrankHarr

Very well then, reasonable doubt. I have not heard of any evidence suggesting that the area the Norse settled in was inhabited or any dispute about this, scientific or otherwise, although I guess the latter must have happened, and is kind of happening now :). They say there is always a dispute, but if it exists its very quiet.

No I don't think we have any tax records (maybe we do, considering the Norse Greenlanders swore fielty to the King of Norway in the 13th century and payed taxes to him, but that is a different century) or polls but we have written historical sources from the Norse and we have many archaeological sites in Greenland. Based on this historians have described the settlement history of Greenland. This Icelandic history book from the year 1991 I got f.e. states that after the Thule appeared in Greenland they split into 2 colonization waves and that the western one reached Disco bay around 1150 and stayed there for 200 years. They then reached the Western settlement in 1350 and the eastern one around 1400. The two groups then met a little to the north east of the southern most point of Greenland. So the Thule were not in southern Greenland shortly before 1000 AD.

As for the Dorset, I have not seen any mention of Dorset findings in the area from that time and the Norse do not mention them. Yes human remains are fragile but Greenland is cold, preserving organic tissue, and we still got inorganic artifacts, tools and the like, which are much more common to find than direct remains.

In the end the burden of proof is on the other side, like with the tea pot in orbit around the sun and God. Archaeology has surpriced us, like when the found remains of Neanderthals in Finland (they lived there during a glacial interval) but considering the lack of proof, I am sceptical.



3 months ago #9173517        

For those of you who say that the original setteler on greenland and Vínland was from norway you are both right and wrong, he was from norway but was consider to be from Iceland becuse he lived there for most of his life



3 months ago #9170103        

@olvirki

"But to make sure, there is no doubt the area the vikings settled in was uninhabited and they had to travel long distances to make contact with any other humans for a few hundred years."

I wonder why there is not doubt. Do they have the tax records for the far side of the island at the time?

I'm not arguing that there WERE people. I'm just surprised at your certanty. Most the signs of human habitation until the industrial age just . . . rot away. Most people who've ever lived lest no trace whatesoever.





Add comment: Please Sign in or create an accout to comment.

View all 1089 comments



Share Scandinavia and the World:






Latest comic in your News Feed:






Copyright © 2009-2014 Scandinavia and the World

contact@satwcomic.com | Coded by Dayvi | Privacy Policy



Mepsu     Scandinavia and the World     Romantically Apocalyptic     StupidFox     Acero Tiburon     Awut     Niels     Humon Comics     Manala Next Door     Forum Peeps