Gold Membership Info
At the moment Denmark is being sued for handing over war-prisoners to USA. Denmark claims it did not know USA used torture.
Denmark have been kissing up to USA a lot since the war started, to a point where Denmark have lost more soldiers per capita than any other country (Obviously USA have lost the most soldiers overall).
He just really really wants a big strong friend...
24th January 2011
Please support SatW via
Share Scandinavia and the World:
Latest comic in your News Feed:
We have an awesome newsletter with 2,763 subscribers!
Latest comic news
Iceland's Demon Cat
13 days ago
I have visited the USA. Despite how great Obamacare sounds to Europeans, (enlightened socialist caring for the poorest) the carefully -planned infrastructure just isn't there; the whole society would have to be geared to it and America (frightened of anything "socialist") doesn't understand how carefully the entire system must be to work. So Obama & company said "Presto, instant medical coverage for everybody" and thinks like magic it's going to work. As a matter of fact, Obambacare is a disaster which destroyes the rather decent systems many individual states had quietly set up on their own to help the poor. All it does is make many people unable to afford insurance any more; enrich the insurance companies; and drive doctors crazy with more bureaucracy (so that as many as possible are retiring early). Fewer students want to take on the debt of going to medical school because of the hassle of working under the new system, which is nightmarish because invented by politicians who know nothing of medicine.
2 months ago
The unfair trials held against African Americans in the 18-1900s make me ask the same question. Excluding the fact that he's also at fault in this case, of all countries, why make *America* the judge?
4 months ago
Why is America even the judge? xD
5 months ago
By the USA? Dose that mean he is in America? And that was a really bad fallacy.
5 months ago
- That's what I said. It's not "anecdotal". It's observation, which is the definition of "scientific" proof - direct observation, rather than impressions or beliefs. And after talking to the people who work in my Doctor's office about 2 weeks ago, they confirm that what I said was true for every person they see and not just myself. They also confirmed that they now have ten times the amount of paperwork that must be filled out and mailed to government agencies than they were doing just a couple of years ago. They've raised rates, hired special "paperwork" staff, and reduced the time that the Doctors (six of them) see each patient. And they're still making less money in their overall practice, now.
My point below was not about comparisons of evidence. It was about governmental interference in medical practice making the entire medical system worse for everyone involved. Which it has most definitely done. If you want to disagree with me on that point you're welcome to, but I believe there are millions of people who would disagree with your opinion.
5 months ago
5 months ago
Sorry, but that's not what anecdotal evidence is. It has nothing to do with whether or not it's a first person story, and everything to do with people using stories (or "anecdotes") as a substitute for scientific evidence.
6 months ago
Don't give me "nice try", as though you know something I don't. What I wrote was not "anecdotal evidence", what I wrote was my own experiences with the medical system in the U.S. That was an eyewitness account, my personal experiences. Which are actually DIRECT evidence of how these policies affect people in the U.S. "Anecdotal evidence", as you call it, is a third-person heresay account of how something affected somebody else. This is not that. This is my own life I was writing about.
Here is the wikipedia description of the "Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality":
"The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), formerly known as the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, is one of twelve agencies within the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The agency began as the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and was tasked with producing guidelines. However, it became controversial when it produced several guidelines which would reduce medical drugs and procedures. This included concern from ophthalmologists on a cataract guideline and concern by the pharmaceutical industry over a reduction in the use of new drugs. When the agency produced a guideline which concluded that back pain surgery was unnecessary and potentially harmful, a lobbying campaign, aided by Congressmen whose backs had been operated on, changed the name of the agency and "wound down" the guidelines program."
In other words, your "agency" has been discredited because it was shown to be biased - rather than showing factual information, which is what they were supposed to do. They were corrupt, and they lied. They are not a truthful source of information. This is why, when I show numbers or statistics, I show them from many different sources. Choosing only one source is almost proof that you only want to show one point of view, rather than the actual facts.
As for your last comment... I'm assuming you don't live in the U.S., because everyone here knows that the U.S. government is rapidly spending the country into bankruptcy. And you would know that the U.S. government has no interest in "looking after it's citizens", a concept that only a very young person would actually believe. People around the world see us as "rich", for some reason, when the truth is that the U.S. can't pay the bills it keeps promising year-to-year. Eight years ago we had a National Debt of about 7 or 8 Trillion U.S. dollars. Today, we have a National Debt of 18 Trillion dollars.
The U.S. is no longer "rich", if we ever were. (And if we ever were, little people like me never saw it.) The U.S., if it were a person, has maxed out all his credit cards... sold the second car... taken another mortgage on the house... rented out the extra room... had several garage sales... and STILL can't pay his bills without taking out new credit cards. If we don't do something drastic in this country in the next ten years, we will end up just like Greece is today - because we can't afford all the crap that our government is paying for right now. Personally, I think shopping-online channels should be outlawed in Washington D.C., because our own Senators can't seem to stop themselves from BUYING anything that anybody wants to sell them. We are GOING BROKE here, and they just KEEP spending money we don't have! It's really, really stupid...
6 months ago
Actually, my numbers were from the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality, rather than from an article. I will trust that over anecdotal evidence. Nice try, though.
I'm sorry you look down on "government handouts," but I'm sure the richest country in the history of the world can afford to look after its citizens.
6 months ago
You're apparently reading an article and repeating numbers. Schools are always making new doctors, but the number is rapidly going down because so many of them are retiring - many of them retiring early because they don't want to deal with all the new paperwork, which was bad enough already. There is no growth, it's definitely a decline.
The statistic that you quote about "visits" to the doctor doesn't include what I was talking about. My "visits" to the doctor are twice a year, which used to be once a year until another federal rule was enforced - about 3 years ago. I have to travel to my doctors office, sign paperwork for a prescription, carry that piece of paper to the pharmacy, then wait there until they fill it. Every month. Last year I went to the doc's office twice a year and re-filled prescriptions over the phone. 3 years ago I went to their office once a year, and re-filled the prescriptions over the phone. I'm burning a lot of petrol, I'm using a lot of my own time, I'm wasting a lot of time for the doc's office and the pharmacy, I'm generating huge amounts of paperwork... all for something that was very simple to do about 3 years ago. And it's all because of the grand-sounding "healthcare reform" that people love to say is such a good thing.
Oh, and on top of all that... I had to drop my health insurance because the payment rates suddenly became twice as much as they were before this so-called "reform". I couldn't afford it anymore. The U.S. government says, "but, you can apply for 'obamacare' now...", which is basically another welfare program that the U.S. can't afford to pay for. So it adds billions, if not trillions, to the National Debt.
I didn't apply for the welfare program. Which means I now have to pay a penalty on my federal tax documents of something like $150, I think. So... I HAD health insurance, they "reformed healthcare", the rates for the insurance went WAY up, I couldn't afford it, I refused to beg for government handouts for the poor, and NOW I'm being fined by the federal government for not having health insurance.
Please, please, tell me how ANY of this makes ANY sense at all. I'd love to hear it.
Add comment: Please
create an accout
View all 769 comments